Lucy

. These are all different covers of LUCY, I thought it might be interesting to compare, although I myself am unsure what to make of it :)

Lucy's relationship with Peggy seems to be one of usefulness on both parts. The two share a common element of loneliness and the desire to change that common trait. I believe Lucy is trying to full her empty void through her friendship with Peggy. This is most strongly suported by the fact that the two girls seem to be worlds apart and yet they find themselves desiring one anothers company. This is most likely becuase they are comfortable enough in each others presence to allow the other person to fill the empty void despite their lack of connectedness. For example, Lucy provides a description of this new found freidnship, "The funny thing was that Peggy and I were not alike, either, but that is just what we liked about each other; what we didnt have in common were things we approved of anyway." (61) It almost seems as if the fact that the two women have nothing in common is essential to the nature of their relationship; they fill in the voids with their differences. Had they been the same, how could they have filled anything for each other? They would have been in the exact same position they had begun in.

I find this relationship to be interesting because I feel as if the two women are unaccustomed to female relationships. Although Lucy has a certain relationship with Mariah and as readers we are unsure of Peggys past relationships, I still feel Kincaid has somehow managed to illustrate the two women in lacking in female relations, or at least not very good at them. Other than Mariah, the only female relationship Lucy is familiar with is one with that of her mother, and this relationship is not a particularly strong one. I believe this unaccustomed nature of Lucy and Peggy plays a strong role in their friendship. It may just be this quality as well as being lonely that are the only two common traits these two women share. Maybe they are comfortable with each other because they are not normally comfortable with other female relations, and they see this reflected in each other.

Interpretor of Maladies

Jhumpa Lahiri's choice of title is very expressive of that which she is trying to portray through her short stories. In reference to "Maladies", she is most likely discussing the issues and circumstances surrounding the Indian-American experience, as she revealed. But what makes the choice of the word 'maladies' so interesting is the obscure way it can be interpreted in comparison to similar words such as 'problems', 'ailments' or 'issues'. It is possible that Lahiri is not only interpreting life situations within the Indian-American experience, but also interpreting the way in which an issue may be represented. What does it mean to be Indian? American? Indian-American? It is this question of interconnected identity that is discussed and brought forth in her stories.

Lahiri question of the human experience and identity is a broad and complex issue that is difficult to tackle. Yet through her creative prose she manages to deliver an answer, or at least an examination, to this issue. I believe her story, "This Blessed House" is certainly an depiction of the human experience. It happens around the world; man and woman marry, move, and live on their own. This is an often common human experience that is made even more difficult by having to blend two cultures simultaneously. In Sanjeevs eyes, twinkle blends too much. It is possible that in Twinkle's eyes, Sanjeev doesnt blend enough. For example when Twinkle finds a tiny porcelain effigy of Christ, Sanjeev instructs her to, "Check the expiration. And at the very least get rid of that idiotic statue." (136) It appears that Sanjeev fails to realize that he lives in a melting pot community; one in which in order to have peace, respect for other cultures and religions is a necesary part of daily life. It is in this issue that Twinkle pften contradicts him. For example, "She planted a kiss on top of Christs head, then placed the statue on top of the fireplace mantle..."(137)Twinkle, however, seems to lose her identity as a Hindu in being so adamant the effigy of Christ. To Sanjeev, it appears that she is losing her roots in a community where they are outnumbered. This question of blending makes their new marital and living situation change all the more difficult. Tis issue that Sanjeev and Twinkle are facing with one another is Lahiri's examination of a maladie (malady?) that is troubling an Indian-American couple.

This issue of blending and balancing, which in essence is what Twinkle and Sanjeev are tryign to do, is part of the story that Lahiri is trying to tell about the Indian-American experience. I believe that both characters, especially Sanjeev, are struggling with identity issues. Twinkle seems to be drawn to the Christian relics and statues, that obviously are not symbolic of Hinduism. Whereas Sanjeev is bothered and agitated by Twinkle's actions. He seems to be struggling with maintaining his Hindu identity where it is a minority. But he is also not open in a way that would help his transition as an Indian-American.

This is a Time Magazine cover page that was adressing an article about Indians coming to America. I thought this was an interesting picture, that sort of documented the Indian-American eperience.

O and Shakespeare

In the film O, there were many things that the filmmaker did that caught my eye. Similar to last viewing, the use of colors really stuck out to me. A very interesting and powerful shot, I thought, that executed this meticulous use of color was a scene right before Em took Des' scarf off the floor. The scarf falls to the floor and lands on a red carpet. The shot is held for several seconds to emphasize the importance of the scarf. I believe that the red carpet was no accident, and very particularly placed by the filmmaker. The color of the carpet combined with the scarf could possibly be foreshadowing events to come. When Oden realizes that Des does not have the scarf, this triggers many significant events. He becomes violently angry and his suspicsions that Des is cheating on him are confirmed in his mind. He then resorts to drugs and his demeanor rapidly changes. As we all know from reading Othello that this movie will most likely end in a violent tragic manner--much to do with the scarf. The red carpet foreshdows the bloodshed that is to follow in the path of the scarf, hence the several second shot in which is filmed the scarf on a red carpet.

The scarf and the foreshadowing red carpet triggered many events in the movie that I believe reflect the play itself. Thus, implying that Shakespeare is, in fact, universal. Viewing the many popular adaptions of Shakespeares play today such as, O and 10 Things I Hate About You, it cant be denied that Shakespeare universally speaks to audiences in a timeless manner. Although these movies are adaptions and therefore lack much of the speech and have a unique take on events, this does not degrade the value of Shakespeares stories, which after all is the essence of his works. It is his stories combined with his poetic language that aften captures his audiences. I say this because even in his time, everyone who viewed his plays was not completely literary, for example the 'groundlings' who would stand and watch at the bottom of the theatre would still enjoy his plays despite their illiteracy and possible lack of comprehension of many of his lines. Therefore it is his stories that speak universally to many of us hundreds of years later. In a personal note, I honestly still get worked up when viewing any version of Romeo and Juliet (especially when Leo's in it :) ) because it make's me think about my boyfriend (who's not Leo
:(...haha). This is because Shakespeares story about love will effect people forever, unless for some reason the world becomes a loveless society--but then we have a bigger problem.

http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Studio/9226/elekiss.jpg

Othello

I believe that the version of Othello that we watched in class really captured my own personal perception of the play. The strongets characteristic of the movie that we watched in class was mosr likely the color palette. I had pictured the play has being strongly based on physical perception. Thereofre I saw it as very straight forward--black, white, and red. The movie reflected my perception. It cast Othello in black clothing and the others in white, drawing a strong contrast between the characters. Blood was very evident; the color red unmistakable against the black and white color scheme.

I also felt that this helped to focus the viewer on the characters. Dramatic or complex costumes may have drawn attentin away from the acting and therefore created a more material, visually appealing performance, rather than an emotional and beleivable performance.

Othello

In class we have been discussing the idea of reputation and if it is truly representative of one's self as some characters in Othello believe. I think reputation can be thought of in many different ways, and I believe there is a strong connection between reputation and placement, or rather loss of reputation and displacement. Many of the characters in Othello pride themselves, and almost define themselves on reputation. Reputation is something they spend their lives earning. It is an accomplishment and a definition of success, that is if it is a positive reputation.

In Othello their are many different elements which define reputation. As we discussed in class, we could compile a nearly page long list of things such as class, religion, and complexion. But, when one of these elements becomes tainted or lost, the character, like many people, may feel that their very selves have been tainted and loss. It is this that connects reputation to displacement. When reputation suffers a character may begin to feel out of place. Displacement often occures when one feels they do not belong, this could be because of class, religion, or complexion, among many other things.

Although displacement usually has a negative connotation, I believe it is possible to argue that Othello has been positively displaced. Being a moore, Othello has been categorized. He has been thought of as fitting a certain mold, having a certain place. When he marries Desdemona, he breaks this mold and takes himself out of his so-called "place". He enters a 'higher realm' in which those belonging in it, i.e. Brabantio, are shocked at his new place. Othello has been displaced from the norm and from a comfort zone. Though, not his comfort zone, the comfort zone of those around him, for many people seem to be uncomfortable by this new marriage.

Girl Interrupted

I believe the film, Girl Interrupted, addressed the idea of 'having a place' in the world in both a brilliant and interesting manner. Each character in the film portrayed a confused displaced person. For example the character of Polly is seen as child-like and unable to break into the realm of adulthood. As we learned in viewing the film this was due to her deforming scares, and she wished she could be a child again when she was pretty and loved. Polly has been displaced by society because she is outcasted, intentionally or untentionally, due to a socially constructed concept of beauty in which perfect skin is the standard, not the exceptional. There is no place for Polly in that world. Another example is the character of Susana who as a woman and a mentally 'unstable' person (so to speak), like many of the other patients, cannot find a place in her the world or her life to be who she is. If she cannot be comfortable as woman in her own life, where can she be comfortable? I believe the film raised many of these questions. Much of Susana's struggle entails searching for a comfortable place in a world in which there seems one may not exist.
Unfortunately in both the sixties and present day no such world exists in which female biases are unheard of. The slut archetype still travels through our world sneaking and hiding and popping up when we least expect it, or when we most expect it. And fortunately for us today there is much more knowledge about mental illness than in the sixties it was not spoken of. Susana, who fell victim to double standards struggled to find a place of her own.
Maybe Susana's lack of finding her niche is what caused her to be a girl-interrupted. If we do not have our own place in the world, is it possible to go forward or backward? I dont see how we could go forward without a starting point, without a place. This is how Susana was interrupted. Her life, which may have once been a progressive movement working towards the future, was brought to a halt when she may have found that she had no place or did not know what her place was. She could not continue to move forward if she had no where to move forward from.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I apologize for all the rambling, as I pointed out in my writing metaphor, I have a very difficult
time getting my thoughts from my head to a page without creating a rambled mess. :)...oops?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



...Maybe he can teach us a thing or two about borderline personality disorder :)

In the Yellow Wall Paper I think Gilman discusses both an important and relevant women's issue. Labeling women as having nervous disorder did several things. It made it easier for the women to be put aside, so to speak, and put under control. This made it easier for those around them to deal with them, or rather - not to deal with them. Labeling women as having a nervous disorder also covered up that which may have been the true nature of what was causing a certain mental instability, such as depression and anxiety. Gilman does an excellent job of addressing this issue in her story of the yellow wallpaper. John is a perfect example of how women were almost neglected in their depression and anxiety. Gilman simultaneously uses John to represent the suppresion of women. By using the excuse of the nervous disorder he has trapped her and bound her to the house - not unlike domesticated women. She is forced to aquiesce each demand he places on her and every part of the 0h-so-depressing "cure", which as we've learned does nothing except worsen the condition. In listening to John she gradually makes herself worse paralleling many women house-bound women who grow unsatisfied and trapped in their daily lives.

Gilmans, The Yellow Wallpaper speaks strongly of women's roles, the treatment of women, and the male role in the suppresion of women. Adding to the class discussion I found a useful quote, from John, to further these thoughts,

"My darling, I beg of you, for my sake and for our childs sake, as well as for your own, that you will never for one instant let that idea enter your mind! There is nothing so dangerous, so fascinating, to a temperment like yours. It is a false and foolish fancy. Can you not trust me as a physician when I tell you so?" (4)

This "idea" that he is speaking of is the idea that maybe she only appears to be better - "better in body". But the mere idea that something is plaguing her more seriously than simply being a weak female is preposturous. John also takes it into his own hands to decide for her how she feels. I feel as if women were often percieved at a level no higher than a childs; incapable of making their own decisions or knowing how they feel. In this scene, John is quite condescending and treats her like a child.

I decided to post this quote because I thought it was a good addition to our class discussion. Although I'm sure many of us found John to be extremely irritating (I apologize if I'm incorrectly assuming) throughout much of the story, it was scenes such as the example above that got to me the most.